Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
addClaim

Imaging bladder cancer

Authors: Nigel C, Cowan; Jeremy P, Crew;

Imaging bladder cancer

Abstract

To review recent developments in imaging for bladder cancer (BCa) diagnosis and staging.Recent technical advances in multidetector computed tomography (CT) and, especially, CT urography make CT the preferred imaging modality for diagnosis and staging of BCa. CT urography combined with cystoscopy is emerging as the diagnostic imaging pathway of choice for investigating haematuria. CT provides information about local, lymph node and distant spread in a single examination.Imaging for BCa should only be performed when it makes a difference to patient management. CT is the preferred imaging modality for diagnosing and staging urothelial cancer. Magnetic resonance (MR) imaging is superior for evaluation of the depth of tumour invasion into the bladder wall, but this knowledge may not ultimately affect treatment as feasibility for radical cystectomy depends on staging by a combination of clinical, histopathological and imaging findings. Radical cystectomy may include resection of adjacent organs and regional lymph nodes. The current purpose of CT or MR imaging is to detect T3b disease or higher and, especially, locoregional lymph node metastases. In the future, MR imaging with ultrasmall superparamagnetic iron oxide contrast agents may detect lymph nodes containing metastatic tumour, which may change treatment from surgery to chemotherapy with or without radiotherapy.

Related Organizations
Keywords

Diagnostic Imaging, Patient Selection, Urography, Cystoscopy, Prognosis, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Urinary Bladder Neoplasms, Predictive Value of Tests, Lymphatic Metastasis, Humans, Neoplasm Invasiveness, Lymph Nodes, Tomography, X-Ray Computed, Hematuria, Neoplasm Staging, Ultrasonography

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    30
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Top 10%
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Top 10%
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Top 10%
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
30
Top 10%
Top 10%
Top 10%
Related to Research communities
Cancer Research
Upload OA version
Are you the author of this publication? Upload your Open Access version to Zenodo!
It’s fast and easy, just two clicks!