
pmid: 20625298
To review recent developments in imaging for bladder cancer (BCa) diagnosis and staging.Recent technical advances in multidetector computed tomography (CT) and, especially, CT urography make CT the preferred imaging modality for diagnosis and staging of BCa. CT urography combined with cystoscopy is emerging as the diagnostic imaging pathway of choice for investigating haematuria. CT provides information about local, lymph node and distant spread in a single examination.Imaging for BCa should only be performed when it makes a difference to patient management. CT is the preferred imaging modality for diagnosing and staging urothelial cancer. Magnetic resonance (MR) imaging is superior for evaluation of the depth of tumour invasion into the bladder wall, but this knowledge may not ultimately affect treatment as feasibility for radical cystectomy depends on staging by a combination of clinical, histopathological and imaging findings. Radical cystectomy may include resection of adjacent organs and regional lymph nodes. The current purpose of CT or MR imaging is to detect T3b disease or higher and, especially, locoregional lymph node metastases. In the future, MR imaging with ultrasmall superparamagnetic iron oxide contrast agents may detect lymph nodes containing metastatic tumour, which may change treatment from surgery to chemotherapy with or without radiotherapy.
Diagnostic Imaging, Patient Selection, Urography, Cystoscopy, Prognosis, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Urinary Bladder Neoplasms, Predictive Value of Tests, Lymphatic Metastasis, Humans, Neoplasm Invasiveness, Lymph Nodes, Tomography, X-Ray Computed, Hematuria, Neoplasm Staging, Ultrasonography
Diagnostic Imaging, Patient Selection, Urography, Cystoscopy, Prognosis, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Urinary Bladder Neoplasms, Predictive Value of Tests, Lymphatic Metastasis, Humans, Neoplasm Invasiveness, Lymph Nodes, Tomography, X-Ray Computed, Hematuria, Neoplasm Staging, Ultrasonography
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 30 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 10% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% |
