Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
addClaim

This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.

You have already added 0 works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.

Appendicitis update

Authors: Kara E, Hennelly; Richard, Bachur;

Appendicitis update

Abstract

The diagnostic approach to children with possible appendicitis remains challenging. Although advances in imaging have improved diagnostic accuracy over clinical judgment alone, new management strategies continue to evolve. This review serves as an update on imaging, biomarkers, and management of appendicitis.Abdominal computed tomography (CT) and ultrasound continue to be the ancillary radiologic studies of choice for appendicitis. Recent studies on the use of CT have focused on the need for intravenous or enteral contrast. Despite lower diagnostic performance, ultrasound has the advantage of sparing patients from radiation exposure. MRI is being evaluated as an additional diagnostic modality. New biomarkers, beyond a standard white blood cell count or absolute neutrophil count, continue to be investigated, but these are not being routinely used in practice. Different management approaches are also being investigated, including nonoperative treatment with antibiotic therapy for early, acute appendicitis.The best use of advanced radiologic imaging for children with possible appendicitis is actively debated. CT continues to show superior accuracy as compared with ultrasound; however, screening ultrasounds for nonobese children have advantages. The combination of robust decision rules that incorporate biomarkers and the judicious use of CT will help define diagnostic strategies for appendicitis over the next decade.

Related Organizations
Keywords

Diagnostic Imaging, Humans, Appendicitis, Child, Biomarkers, Abdominal Pain

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    33
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Top 10%
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Top 10%
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
33
Average
Top 10%
Top 10%
Upload OA version
Are you the author of this publication? Upload your Open Access version to Zenodo!
It’s fast and easy, just two clicks!