
pmid: 23502915
Putting evidence into practice at the point of care delivery requires an understanding of implementation strategies that work, in what context and how.To identify methodological issues in implementation science using 4 studies as cases and make recommendations for further methods development.Four cases are presented and methodological issues identified. For each issue raised, evidence on the state of the science is described.Issues in implementation science identified include diverse conceptual frameworks, potential weaknesses in pragmatic study designs, and the paucity of standard concepts and measurement.Recommendations to advance methods in implementation include developing a core set of implementation concepts and metrics, generating standards for implementation methods including pragmatic trials, mixed methods designs, complex interventions and measurement, and endorsing reporting standards for implementation studies.
Counseling, Personnel Turnover, Nursing, Patient Readmission, Risk Assessment, context, methods, Research Support as Topic, Medicine and Health Sciences, Humans, Cooperative Behavior, Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic, Patient Care Team, implementation science, Research, Quality Improvement, Organizational Innovation, Patient Discharge, United States, Evidence-Based Practice, Accidental Falls, Nursing Staff, Smoking Cessation, Diffusion of Innovation, Foundations
Counseling, Personnel Turnover, Nursing, Patient Readmission, Risk Assessment, context, methods, Research Support as Topic, Medicine and Health Sciences, Humans, Cooperative Behavior, Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic, Patient Care Team, implementation science, Research, Quality Improvement, Organizational Innovation, Patient Discharge, United States, Evidence-Based Practice, Accidental Falls, Nursing Staff, Smoking Cessation, Diffusion of Innovation, Foundations
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 33 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 10% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% |
