Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/ Medical Carearrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
Medical Care
Article
Data sources: UnpayWall
Medical Care
Article . 2013 . Peer-reviewed
Data sources: Crossref
versions View all 2 versions
addClaim

Methodology Issues in Implementation Science

Authors: Newhouse, Robin; Bobay, Kathleen; Dykes, Patricia C.; Stevens, Kathleen R.; Titler, Marita;

Methodology Issues in Implementation Science

Abstract

Putting evidence into practice at the point of care delivery requires an understanding of implementation strategies that work, in what context and how.To identify methodological issues in implementation science using 4 studies as cases and make recommendations for further methods development.Four cases are presented and methodological issues identified. For each issue raised, evidence on the state of the science is described.Issues in implementation science identified include diverse conceptual frameworks, potential weaknesses in pragmatic study designs, and the paucity of standard concepts and measurement.Recommendations to advance methods in implementation include developing a core set of implementation concepts and metrics, generating standards for implementation methods including pragmatic trials, mixed methods designs, complex interventions and measurement, and endorsing reporting standards for implementation studies.

Country
United States
Keywords

Counseling, Personnel Turnover, Nursing, Patient Readmission, Risk Assessment, context, methods, Research Support as Topic, Medicine and Health Sciences, Humans, Cooperative Behavior, Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic, Patient Care Team, implementation science, Research, Quality Improvement, Organizational Innovation, Patient Discharge, United States, Evidence-Based Practice, Accidental Falls, Nursing Staff, Smoking Cessation, Diffusion of Innovation, Foundations

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    33
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Top 10%
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Top 10%
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Top 10%
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
33
Top 10%
Top 10%
Top 10%
bronze