
The aim of this article is to describe the physiologic utility, correlation with lung morphology, difficulties in interpretation and current clinical applications of static respiratory system pressure-volume curves at the bedside in patients with acute lung injury or acute respiratory distress syndrome.Complex interpretation of pressure-volume curves indicates that alveolar reopening continues past the lower inflection point on the linear part of the curve and suggests the presence of homogeneous lung disease in which recruitment is still possible by positive end-expiratory pressure application. Setting positive end-expiratory pressure above the lower inflection point and tidal ventilation (approximately 6 ml/kg) in the linear portion of the respiratory system pressure-volume curve improved mortality and ameliorated lung and plasma inflammatory mediators compared with ventilation with the lowest positive end-expiratory pressure at traditional tidal volumes. Recent studies have found that regular use of pressure-volume curves provides useful physiological data that help to optimize mechanical ventilation at the bedside.The physiologic data obtained by measuring the static pressure-volume curves have helped clinicians to better understand the behavior of the respiratory system when positive-pressure ventilation is applied. The advanced technology incorporated into modern ventilators allows routine measurement of pressure-volume curves under sedation without paralysis, with acceptable variability and no serious adverse effects.
Respiratory Distress Syndrome, Respiratory Mechanics, Humans, static pressure-volume curve, Lung, Lung Compliance, Respiration, Artificial, static pressure-volume curves; respiratory system, respiratory system
Respiratory Distress Syndrome, Respiratory Mechanics, Humans, static pressure-volume curve, Lung, Lung Compliance, Respiration, Artificial, static pressure-volume curves; respiratory system, respiratory system
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 27 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 10% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
