
pmid: 19387343
Nocardia keratitis is a rarity in most parts of the world. If the diagnosis is timely, and appropriate treatment started, then the visual outcome is good. The purpose of this review is to discuss the recently published literature in relation to the epidemiology, cause, diagnosis, and therapy of Nocardia keratitis.The incidence of Nocardia keratitis, although not well established, appears to be increasing with new species identified with newer molecular methods. The different species causing keratitis are Nocardia. arthritidis, N. neocaledoniensis, N. asiatica, N. asteroids type IV, N. brasiliensis, N. pseudobrasiliensis, N. cyriacigeorgica, N. farcinica, N. otitidiscaviarum, and N. transvalensis. Current therapies with fortified amikacin and newer fluoroquinolones are effective, provided the diagnosis has been made in good time. Ongoing research toward rapid diagnosis using various molecular techniques seems to be promising. Diagnostic microbiology laboratories need to be familiar with these organisms especially in endemic areas, and it is important for the clinician to notify the suspicion of such cases.The current recommended treatment is amikacin, and with appropriate therapy, Nocardia keratitis resolves with scarring, with or without vascularization, resulting in good visual outcome.
Keratitis, Treatment Outcome, Incidence, Humans, Nocardia Infections, Amikacin, Nocardia, Anti-Bacterial Agents
Keratitis, Treatment Outcome, Incidence, Humans, Nocardia Infections, Amikacin, Nocardia, Anti-Bacterial Agents
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 38 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 10% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% |
