
pmid: 18854689
Giant-cell arteritis frequently poses diagnostic and therapeutic challenges. This article summarizes recent investigations concerning diagnosis and treatment of giant-cell arteritis.Efforts to improve diagnostic accuracy have centered on serologic markers and imaging techniques. Although the erythrocyte-sedimentation rate, C-reactive protein, and platelet count continue to be the primary markers, others such as interleukin-6 and fibrinogen can provide additional information. High-resolution magnetic resonance imaging and angiography, fluorine-18-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography, and color Doppler ultrasonography can show findings relevant to the diagnosis of giant-cell arteritis. Recent inquiries suggest a steroid-sparing benefit from initiation of treatment with intravenous steroids. Adjunctive treatment with methotrexate may also provide this benefit. Aspirin appears to decrease likelihood of stroke or visual loss in giant-cell arteritis without increasing bleeding complications.An expanded repertoire of imaging techniques and serologic markers may supply information relevant to the diagnosis of challenging cases of giant-cell arteritis. Treatment modifications, including initiation with intravenous steroids, or addition of methotrexate or aspirin to the regimen, may decrease morbidity from disease, corticosteroid treatment or both.
Aspirin, Interleukin-6, Platelet Count, Giant Cell Arteritis, Fibrinogen, Blood Sedimentation, C-Reactive Protein, Methotrexate, Fluorodeoxyglucose F18, Humans, Radiopharmaceuticals, Ultrasonography, Doppler, Color, Glucocorticoids, Magnetic Resonance Angiography
Aspirin, Interleukin-6, Platelet Count, Giant Cell Arteritis, Fibrinogen, Blood Sedimentation, C-Reactive Protein, Methotrexate, Fluorodeoxyglucose F18, Humans, Radiopharmaceuticals, Ultrasonography, Doppler, Color, Glucocorticoids, Magnetic Resonance Angiography
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 13 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 10% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% |
