Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
addClaim

This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.

You have already added 0 works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.

The Prevalence and Pathogenicity of Propionibacterium acnes Keratitis

Authors: Renee Yang; John A. Seedor; Richard S. Koplin; B. Ovodenko; Mahendra Shah; David C. Ritterband;

The Prevalence and Pathogenicity of Propionibacterium acnes Keratitis

Abstract

To study the prevalence, pathogenicity, and virulence of Propionibacterium acnes keratitis.All cases of infectious keratitis submitted to the microbiologic laboratory of the New York Eye and Ear Infirmary between January 1, 2003, and April 6, 2006, were reviewed. Those cases in which P. acnes was recovered from culture were collected, and the medical records studied in depth.Of 1555 cultures submitted to the microbiology laboratory, 1329 (85.5%) were positive for growth. One hundred twenty four (9.3%) of the 1329 cases yielded P. acnes in at least 1 culture medium. Seventy eight (62.9%) of 124 cases had not been pretreated with antibiotics before culture, and 66.7% of the nonpretreated ulcers were monomicrobial (P. acnes only). Fifty one (65.4%) of 78 cases of the nonpretreated corneal ulcers presented with a cellular reaction in anterior chamber, 12 (15.4%) with a hypopyon (6 were monomicrobial), 21 (26.9%) had stromal thinning (12 of which were monomicrobial), and 2 (2.6%) progressed to perforation (both polymicrobial). Corneal ulcers associated with P. acnes tended to be small (66.7%) and were widely distributed: central (n = 17, 21.8%), paracentral (n = 44, 56.4%), and peripheral (n = 17, 21.8%). The most common risk factors were contact lens wear and previous history of ocular surgery. Three of the 78 nonpretreated patients were unresponsive to medical treatment and required surgery for keratitis.This study provides evidence that P. acnes is a frequent cause of bacterial keratitis and may cause significant morbidity.

Related Organizations
Keywords

Adult, Aged, 80 and over, Keratitis, Male, Adolescent, Contact Lenses, Infant, Ophthalmologic Surgical Procedures, Middle Aged, Eye Infections, Bacterial, Medical Records, Anti-Bacterial Agents, Child, Preschool, Prevalence, Humans, Female, Child, Corneal Ulcer, Gram-Positive Bacterial Infections, Aged

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    citations
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    30
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Top 10%
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Top 10%
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Top 10%
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
citations
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
30
Top 10%
Top 10%
Top 10%
Upload OA version
Are you the author? Do you have the OA version of this publication?