Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
addClaim

Fetal Monitoring Bundle

Authors: Howard, Minkoff; Richard, Berkowitz;

Fetal Monitoring Bundle

Abstract

In 2008, the Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development published guidelines for categorizing fetal heart rate patterns. However, even if universally adopted, they will fail to improve outcomes unless they are integrated into a "bundle" of activities. Bundles reduce risks by assuring that key steps in a process are always taken. A fetal monitoring bundle would have four components: credentialed staff, an escalation policy, a known responsible party, and the capability for rapid response. The first requirement would be that all providers are qualified to appropriately interpret and respond to fetal heart rate tracings. Education should be uniform across disciplines, and there should be a credentialing process. Second is an escalation policy: an algorithm for nurses to use when getting help. It would avoid delays that occur when a nurse requesting a check on a tracing is required to call a hierarchical series of residents who must all concur before the attending who can move the patient to the operating room is called. Third, there must be an identified responsible provider at all times, ie, an obstetrician who can be readily contacted in emergent circumstances. Finally, there must be the capability of a rapid response; whenever a patient is monitored, the institution must have the obstetric, anesthesia, and pediatric resources necessary to respond to deteriorating fetal status. This bundle is a key, but not sole, piece of the perinatal safety pie; perinatal safety is advanced through a multifaceted approach anchored in a culture that values and invests in safety.

Keywords

Pregnancy, Humans, Female, Heart Rate, Fetal, Fetal Monitoring, Checklist

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    14
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Top 10%
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Top 10%
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
14
Average
Top 10%
Top 10%
Upload OA version
Are you the author of this publication? Upload your Open Access version to Zenodo!
It’s fast and easy, just two clicks!