Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
addClaim

This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.

You have already added 0 works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.

Association of Gestational Weight Gain Expectations and Advice on Actual Weight Gain

Authors: Marisha DiCarlo; Delia Smith West; Aline Andres; Rebecca A. Krukowski; Mario A. Cleves; Marie E. Saylors;

Association of Gestational Weight Gain Expectations and Advice on Actual Weight Gain

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To examine pregnant women's gestational weight gain expectations and advice from various sources (ie, self, family and friends, physician) and the association of these sources of expectations and advice with measured gestational weight gain. METHODS: This is a secondary analysis of a cohort study of 230 pregnant women in their second pregnancy. Each woman was queried at 12 weeks of gestation about the amount of weight: 1) she felt was “healthy” to gain, 2) she expected to gain, 3) her friends and family thought she should gain, and 4) the specificity of her physician's advice about gestational weight gain. Gestational weight gain was calculated as the difference in measured weight between 4 and 10 weeks and 36 weeks of gestation. Odds ratios and corresponding 95% confidence intervals were computed for the association between excessive gestational weight gain and each question using logistic regression in this secondary analysis. RESULTS: Participants were 87.4% Caucasian. Overweight and obese women were significantly more likely to expect excessive gestational weight gain compared with normal-weight women. Women who reported expecting to gain excessively were significantly more likely to actually gain excessively (52%; odds ratio [OR] 3.19, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.77–5.77) than those who expected to gain within the guidelines (36%). After adjusting for self-reported gestational weight gain in the first pregnancy and sociodemographic characteristics, women who reported expecting to gain excessively were still significantly more likely to gain excessively (51%; OR 2.22, 95% CI 1.08–4.56) than those who expected to gain within guidelines (37%). CONCLUSION: It may be particularly important to develop interventions that positively influence women's own expectations for gestational weight gain. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov, https://clinicaltrials.gov, NCT01131117.

Keywords

Adult, Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice, Ideal Body Weight, Directive Counseling, Friends, Gestational Age, Guidelines as Topic, Weight Gain, Cohort Studies, Pregnancy, Surveys and Questionnaires, Humans, Patient Compliance, Family, Female, Obesity

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    citations
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    13
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Top 10%
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
citations
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
13
Average
Average
Top 10%
Upload OA version
Are you the author of this publication? Upload your Open Access version to Zenodo!
It’s fast and easy, just two clicks!