<script type="text/javascript">
<!--
document.write('<div id="oa_widget"></div>');
document.write('<script type="text/javascript" src="https://www.openaire.eu/index.php?option=com_openaire&view=widget&format=raw&projectId=undefined&type=result"></script>');
-->
</script>
pmid: 39882883
Minimally invasive, image-guided endovascular procedures are becoming increasingly prevalent as techniques and technologies have advanced, particularly within the realm of neurovascular interventions. Endovascular approaches ubiquitously result in endothelial injury with subsequent risk of thromboembolic complications. Periprocedural antiplatelet agent use is an integral component of the management of patients undergoing endovascular neurointerventional procedures. This patient population has a unique risk profile encompassing thromboembolic and hemorrhagic complications simultaneously, and the precise balance of these risks impacts patient outcomes almost as much as the interventional procedure itself. Clinical experience and study consensus demonstrate overall improved outcomes with the use of periprocedural antiplatelet agents, though current practices remain highly institution and practitioner-dependent. This focused review will discuss the major mechanisms of action of antiplatelet agents, and their clinical indications and management in the periprocedural neurointerventional setting. Despite the importance of antiplatelet agents in the management of neurointerventional patients, many questions remain. Further research and clinical expertise are needed to establish standardized, procedure-specific, antiplatelet regimens as well as standardized monitoring of antiplatelet agent regimen efficacy and safety.
Thromboembolism, Endovascular Procedures, Humans, Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors, Neurosurgical Procedures
Thromboembolism, Endovascular Procedures, Humans, Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors, Neurosurgical Procedures
citations This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |