
pmid: 20440109
Genomic research in pain, anesthesia and analgesia generated some hope that pharmacogenetics may guide anesthesiologists to provide effective medicine in a 'tailored' manner. Within the field of obstetric anesthesia, relatively few studies have evaluated the effect of polymorphisms on the perception of labor or postcesarean pain or the response to analgesics for childbirth. Because of the multifactorial nature of labor and delivery pain and particularly challenging clinical context, many consider that 'titration of drugs to the desired effect works just fine'. With recent evidence highlighting an association between severe postdelivery pain and persistent pain, early recognition of an increased susceptibility for acute pain has become particularly relevant.Neuraxial labor analgesia is influenced by a common polymorphism of the mu-opioid receptor gene. This polymorphism also affects the analgesic response to systemic opioids for postcesarean pain and other types of surgeries. Finally, the risk for persistent pain after cesarean deliveries may be associated with a certain genetic profile.Although still premature to anticipate clinical implications and a change in practice based on these recent discoveries, genetic variability clearly appears to affect pain perception, response to analgesics and predisposition for the development of chronic pain.
Pain, Postoperative, Morphine, Cesarean Section, Codeine, Pain, Anesthesia, Spinal, Analgesics, Opioid, Fentanyl, Pharmacogenetics, Pregnancy, Receptors, Opioid, Anesthesia, Obstetrical, Humans, Female, Genetic Predisposition to Disease
Pain, Postoperative, Morphine, Cesarean Section, Codeine, Pain, Anesthesia, Spinal, Analgesics, Opioid, Fentanyl, Pharmacogenetics, Pregnancy, Receptors, Opioid, Anesthesia, Obstetrical, Humans, Female, Genetic Predisposition to Disease
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 19 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 10% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% |
