Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
addClaim

This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.

You have already added 0 works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.

Surgical Management of Juvenile Amputation Overgrowth With a Synthetic Cap

Authors: Dawn W. Blackhurst; Jon R. Davids; Helen E. Gruber; Mark J. Tenholder;

Surgical Management of Juvenile Amputation Overgrowth With a Synthetic Cap

Abstract

Seventeen amputations (in 14 children) with established overgrowth were treated by capping of the residual limb with a polytetrafluoroethylene (PTFE) felt pad. Average age at the time of the procedure was 7 years 10 months. Mean follow-up was 4 years 9 months. Statistical comparisons were made to historical controls, treated by resection revision or biologic capping, from a prior overgrowth study from the authors' institution. Revision surgery was necessary in 86% of resection revisions, 29% of biologic caps, and 29% of PTFE caps. Kaplan-Meier analysis estimated survival times of 3 years 3 months for resection revision, 6 years 1 month for biologic caps, and 7 years 2 months for PTFE caps. PTFE and biologic caps were both statistically better than resection revision with regard to need for subsequent operation and survivorship, but were not statistically different from each other. Complications associated with PTFE capping and biologic capping were distinct.

Keywords

Male, Amputation Stumps, Infant, Biocompatible Materials, Prostheses and Implants, Amputation, Surgical, Treatment Outcome, Child, Preschool, Humans, Female, Bone Diseases, Child, Polytetrafluoroethylene, Retrospective Studies

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    citations
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    26
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Top 10%
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Top 10%
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
citations
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
26
Top 10%
Top 10%
Average
Upload OA version
Are you the author? Do you have the OA version of this publication?