Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
addClaim

This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.

You have already added 0 works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.

Reliability and Validity of the Braden Scale for Predicting Pressure Ulcer Risk

Authors: Daria L, Kring;

Reliability and Validity of the Braden Scale for Predicting Pressure Ulcer Risk

Abstract

Multiple tools have been developed to assist nurses and other care providers to identify and quantify pressure ulcer risk. One of the most widely used tools is the Braden Scale for Predicting Pressure Ulcer Risk. It has been in use for 2 decades and multiple studies have individually reported on its reliability and validity. This article summarizes the reliability and validity of the instrument, and discusses implications for its use in clinical and research settings. The Braden Scale for Predicting Pressure Ulcer Risk has generally performed well in the clinical setting. It has demonstrated reliability and validity in multiple clinical settings, and its parsimonious format enhances incorporation into routine clinical practice. Expanding the instrument may further increase its reliability and validity in the research setting.

Keywords

Pressure Ulcer, Humans, Reproducibility of Results, Risk Assessment, Sensitivity and Specificity

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    54
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Top 10%
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Top 10%
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Top 10%
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
54
Top 10%
Top 10%
Top 10%
Upload OA version
Are you the author of this publication? Upload your Open Access version to Zenodo!
It’s fast and easy, just two clicks!