
pmid: 15167392
The aim of this study was to prospectively investigate the effect of potential workplace closure, an externally attributed form of job insecurity, on fatigue and psychological distress. In April 1999, the minister responsible announced that a governmental agency would close down one of its two locations. Baseline data from the employees were available before the closure announcement (n = 574) because they were enrolled in the Maastricht Cohort Study on "Fatigue at Work." In the closure group, the relative risk for becoming a psychological distress case was 1.61 (95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.27-2.05) during 13 months after the closure threat. Within the closure group, a difference in relative risk for psychological distress was observed between employees who self reported an increase in job insecurity (relative risk = 1.85; 95% CI = 1.41-2.42) and employees who did not report an increase in job insecurity (relative risk 1.14; 95% CI = 0.58-2.24)
Male, Unemployment, Humans, Female, Comorbidity, Prospective Studies, Workplace, Fatigue, Occupational Health, Stress, Psychological
Male, Unemployment, Humans, Female, Comorbidity, Prospective Studies, Workplace, Fatigue, Occupational Health, Stress, Psychological
| citations This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 37 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 10% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% |
