Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
addClaim

This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.

You have already added 0 works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.

Orbital Complications of Hydrogel Scleral Buckles

Authors: Aaron Fay; C Robert Bernardino; Lisa D. Mihora; Peter A. D. Rubin;

Orbital Complications of Hydrogel Scleral Buckles

Abstract

Hydrogel is a biocompatible osmotic expansile material used in contact lenses, scleral buckles, and orbital expanders. Three unique complications from hydrogel scleral buckle use are presented: orbital cellulitis mimicry, fornical shortening with orbital prosthetic intolerance, and orbital pseudotumor.A retrospective chart review was conducted on three subjects with unknown hydrogel scleral buckle complications at a tertiary care oculoplastics practice. Demographics, imaging studies, and pathologic specimens were reviewed.All three patients had a history of encircling hydrogel scleral buckle placed for retinal detachment. The mean time from implantation to presentation was 10.7 years (range, 7 to 15 years). One patient had an onset of presumed orbital cellulitis caused by an enlarged buckle and no abscess. The second patient had inability to wear an evisceration prosthesis as the result of a shortened fornix from an enlarged hydrogel scleral buckle implant. The third patient presented with an orbital mass caused by the enlarged implant. In all cases, surgical removal of the expanded buckle relieved the patient's symptoms.Although the hydrogel scleral band is designed to expand in a controlled fashion, overexpansion can occur. Expansion can cause buckle extrusion, prosthetic intolerance, a pseudo-orbital cellulitis, or orbital pseudotumor and may be due to a chemical change in the hydrogel polymer. Patients with hydrogel scleral buckles should be followed long-term for possible complications. Patients with newer uses of hydrogel, such as orbital expanders, should also be observed for long-term complications.

Keywords

Adult, Male, Reoperation, Retinal Detachment, Cellulitis, Middle Aged, Hydrogel, Polyethylene Glycol Dimethacrylate, Scleral Buckling, Postoperative Complications, Orbital Diseases, Humans, Female, Tomography, X-Ray Computed, Device Removal, Retrospective Studies

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    citations
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    30
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Top 10%
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Top 10%
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
citations
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
30
Top 10%
Top 10%
Average
Upload OA version
Are you the author? Do you have the OA version of this publication?