
pmid: 15577479
Hemiresurfacing of the femoral head for treatment of osteonecrosis has been proposed as a reasonable alternative to total hip arthroplasty. The results of 59 patients with Ficat Stage III osteonecrosis done by a single surgeon are reviewed. At an average followup of 4.5 years, 16 patients were considered failures because of conversion to total hip arthroplasty or considerable groin pain requiring medication. Failure did not correlate with age, body mass index, preoperative length of symptoms, acetabular articular cartilage status at the time of surgery, or cause of the underlying disease. The only factor associated with failure was a lower preoperative Harris hip score. Conversion of the failed implants to total hip arthroplasty was straightforward, confirming the conservative nature of the procedure. However, pain relief and recovery after resurfacing are less reliable than that associated with total hip arthroplasty. This procedure may be appropriate for patients younger than 30 years, given the ease of conversion to THR if failure occurs. The patient should be counseled regarding expectations.
Adult, Cartilage, Articular, Male, Analysis of Variance, Arthroplasty, Replacement, Hip, Middle Aged, Prosthesis Design, Risk Assessment, Severity of Illness Index, Cohort Studies, Femur Head Necrosis, Humans, Female, Orthopedic Procedures, Hip Prosthesis, Range of Motion, Articular, Follow-Up Studies, Pain Measurement, Probability, Retrospective Studies
Adult, Cartilage, Articular, Male, Analysis of Variance, Arthroplasty, Replacement, Hip, Middle Aged, Prosthesis Design, Risk Assessment, Severity of Illness Index, Cohort Studies, Femur Head Necrosis, Humans, Female, Orthopedic Procedures, Hip Prosthesis, Range of Motion, Articular, Follow-Up Studies, Pain Measurement, Probability, Retrospective Studies
| citations This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 49 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 10% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% |
