
<script type="text/javascript">
<!--
document.write('<div id="oa_widget"></div>');
document.write('<script type="text/javascript" src="https://www.openaire.eu/index.php?option=com_openaire&view=widget&format=raw&projectId=undefined&type=result"></script>');
-->
</script>Dual energy x-ray absorptiometry (DXA) is currently the best clinically available tool for diagnosing decreased bone mineral density before osteoporotic fractures occur. The recent introduction of new treatment options for osteoporosis makes accurate and early diagnosis more important than in the past. Some women lose bone at the rate of 3-5% per year in the years immediately after menopause. DXA allows early identification of individuals at risk of fracture when osteoporosis is still asymptomatic. In epidemiologic studies, each standard deviation decrease in bone mineral density at the hip is associated with an approximately 2.5-fold increase in the risk of hip fracture. The average 50-year-old woman has an approximately 40% chance of suffering one or more fragility fractures during her lifetime. DXA allows identification of individuals at risk. Insurance coverage of DXA remains variable among insurers and accepted indications are limited. This report describes some pitfalls in practical use of DXA scans, current definitions used in reporting, and provides suggestions on when DXA scans should be done.
Diagnosis, Differential, Male, Absorptiometry, Photon, Bone Density, Humans, Osteoporosis, Female, Middle Aged, Sensitivity and Specificity, Osteoporosis, Postmenopausal, Aged, Ultrasonography
Diagnosis, Differential, Male, Absorptiometry, Photon, Bone Density, Humans, Osteoporosis, Female, Middle Aged, Sensitivity and Specificity, Osteoporosis, Postmenopausal, Aged, Ultrasonography
| citations This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 4 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
