Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
addClaim

This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.

You have already added 0 works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.

Maxillofacial injuries in the multiply injured

Authors: Cannell H; Paterson A; Dyer Pv;

Maxillofacial injuries in the multiply injured

Abstract

A survey of patients with maxillofacial injuries (MFI) was carried out in a triaged cohort of multiply injured patients (n = 802) evacuated from accident scenes by the helicopter emergency medical service (HEMS). Despite intubation at accident scenes, some patients required further airway protection on arrival at hospital. One hundred and ninety-six patients (24.5%) had MFI and 90 (11.2%) were classified as severe with ISS of facial region > 2 or more severe (ISS up to 16, median 4). The latter group were commonly found to be associated with other severe injuries (median ISS of 36) leading to death in 41 patients (5.1% of the total). Out of the 196 multiply injured patients with MFI, 57 (29%) had diagnostic peritoneal lavage for suspected haemorrhage, 27 (14%) subsequently underwent laparotomy. Six (3%) had thoracotomies and 29 (15%) had chest drains inserted. Seventeen (9%) had emergency craniotomies and 14 (7%) required intracranial pressure monitoring. Orthopaedic injuries were most commonly associated with MFI and 91 patients (46%) underwent surgical interventions. The purpose of the present study was primarily to establish a database for MFI patients with multiple injuries. The longer term objective being to gain evidence for early definitive management of these complicated cases rather than the more traditional expectant policies. In our view delayed management of MFI can rarely correct all the consequent facial deformities.

Related Organizations
Keywords

Adult, Aged, 80 and over, Male, Emergency Medical Services, Adolescent, Databases, Factual, Multiple Trauma, Infant, Middle Aged, Age Distribution, Injury Severity Score, Child, Preschool, London, Humans, Female, Maxillofacial Injuries, Prospective Studies, Child, Aged, Retrospective Studies

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    citations
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    16
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Top 10%
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
citations
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
16
Average
Top 10%
Average
Upload OA version
Are you the author of this publication? Upload your Open Access version to Zenodo!
It’s fast and easy, just two clicks!