Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
addClaim

This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.

You have already added 0 works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.

Wireless Technology Improves Nursing Workflow and Communications

Authors: Fran Turisco; William Greskovich; Susan Breslin;

Wireless Technology Improves Nursing Workflow and Communications

Abstract

Inpatient healthcare delivery involves complex processes that require interdisciplinary teamwork and frequent communication among physicians, nurses, unit secretaries, and ancillary staff. Often, these interactions are not at a nursing unit, or near a phone. In an effort to address the inefficiencies of these workflow processes and communications, St. Agnes HealthCare, Baltimore, MD, installed a new hands-free communications system that uses a wireless network, voice recognition, and a small wearable badge. Developed by Vocera, the communications system permits one-button access to others on the system or connects to outside phones through PBX integration. While many agree that today's technology has the potential to positively impact nursing care delivery, St. Agnes HealthCare and Vocera, with assistance from First Consulting Group, decided to conduct a comprehensive benefits study in December 2003 to quantify the impact of this communications system on workflow and communications. The results identified a number of significant findings that demonstrate its value from a quantitative and qualitative standpoint. The following article describes this study and its findings.

Keywords

Attitude of Health Personnel, Communication, Interprofessional Relations, Equipment Design, Nursing Methodology Research, Workload, Nursing Staff, Hospital, Efficiency, Organizational, Nursing Administration Research, Medical Secretaries, Surveys and Questionnaires, Time and Motion Studies, Baltimore, Health Facility Environment, Humans, Hospital Communication Systems, Noise, Cell Phone, Qualitative Research, Quality of Health Care

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    citations
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    52
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Top 10%
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Top 10%
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Top 10%
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
citations
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
52
Top 10%
Top 10%
Top 10%
Upload OA version
Are you the author of this publication? Upload your Open Access version to Zenodo!
It’s fast and easy, just two clicks!