
pmid: 15520597
Inpatient healthcare delivery involves complex processes that require interdisciplinary teamwork and frequent communication among physicians, nurses, unit secretaries, and ancillary staff. Often, these interactions are not at a nursing unit, or near a phone. In an effort to address the inefficiencies of these workflow processes and communications, St. Agnes HealthCare, Baltimore, MD, installed a new hands-free communications system that uses a wireless network, voice recognition, and a small wearable badge. Developed by Vocera, the communications system permits one-button access to others on the system or connects to outside phones through PBX integration. While many agree that today's technology has the potential to positively impact nursing care delivery, St. Agnes HealthCare and Vocera, with assistance from First Consulting Group, decided to conduct a comprehensive benefits study in December 2003 to quantify the impact of this communications system on workflow and communications. The results identified a number of significant findings that demonstrate its value from a quantitative and qualitative standpoint. The following article describes this study and its findings.
Attitude of Health Personnel, Communication, Interprofessional Relations, Equipment Design, Nursing Methodology Research, Workload, Nursing Staff, Hospital, Efficiency, Organizational, Nursing Administration Research, Medical Secretaries, Surveys and Questionnaires, Time and Motion Studies, Baltimore, Health Facility Environment, Humans, Hospital Communication Systems, Noise, Cell Phone, Qualitative Research, Quality of Health Care
Attitude of Health Personnel, Communication, Interprofessional Relations, Equipment Design, Nursing Methodology Research, Workload, Nursing Staff, Hospital, Efficiency, Organizational, Nursing Administration Research, Medical Secretaries, Surveys and Questionnaires, Time and Motion Studies, Baltimore, Health Facility Environment, Humans, Hospital Communication Systems, Noise, Cell Phone, Qualitative Research, Quality of Health Care
| citations This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 52 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 10% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% |
