Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
addClaim

This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.

You have already added 0 works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.

A Retrospective Analysis of the Management of Ailing and Failing Endosseous Dental Implants

Authors: Mark H. Zablotsky;

A Retrospective Analysis of the Management of Ailing and Failing Endosseous Dental Implants

Abstract

Very little has been presented in the scientific literature regarding the ability of practitioners to salvage the ailing dental implant once bone loss has occurred. The purpose of this study was to follow patients who had bone loss and increased probing depths associated with their dental implants after initial integration and restoration. All patients either were referred for the treatment of these implant problems or were patients on supportive periodontal therapy in this periodontal practice. Forty-two ailing/failing implants in 21 consecutive patients (ages 22-87) all having signs of excessive bone loss and bleeding on probing (most having suppuration) were treated either resectively or via hard or soft tissue augmentation and were followed for 42 to 84 months (average 54 months) in this retrospective study.

Keywords

Adult, Aged, 80 and over, Dental Implants, Male, Reoperation, Bone Regeneration, Dental Implantation, Endosseous, Alveolar Bone Loss, Middle Aged, Treatment Outcome, Osseointegration, Guided Tissue Regeneration, Periodontal, Humans, Dental Restoration Failure, Periodontal Diseases, Aged, Retrospective Studies

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    citations
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    7
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
citations
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
7
Average
Average
Average
Upload OA version
Are you the author? Do you have the OA version of this publication?