Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
Transplantationarrow_drop_down
Transplantation
Article . 1970 . Peer-reviewed
Data sources: Crossref
Science
Article . 1969 . Peer-reviewed
Data sources: Crossref
Science
Article . 1969
versions View all 3 versions
addClaim

This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.

You have already added 0 works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.

Specific tissue graft rejection in earthworms

Authors: Edwin L. Cooper;

Specific tissue graft rejection in earthworms

Abstract

Earthworms are capable of destroying antigenic tissues. Autogeneis transplants healed in regularly and remained permanently viable. Xenografts, by contrast, were cicatrized but eventually rejected. Intrafamilial transplants survived longer than interfamilial ones. Xenografts and autografts placed in the same graft bed were joined to each other but xenografts were later destroyed although autografts were not. Two xenografts from Eisenia to Lumbricus , performed simultaneously, showed survival endpoints similar to a single xenograft. A 5-day interval between first- and second-set grafting led to an accelerated rejection of both transplants. First-set Allolobophora transplants to Lumbricus performed simultaneously with second-set Eisenia grafts were destroyed at a time different from either of the two Eisenia transplants. A single Allolobophora transplant to Lumbricus was rejected at survival times equivalent to Allolobophora along with two Eisenia transplants.

Related Organizations
Keywords

Species Specificity, Transplantation Immunology, Annelida, Transplantation, Heterologous, Animals, Transplantation, Homologous, Transplantation, Autologous

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    citations
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    81
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Top 1%
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Top 10%
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
citations
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
81
Average
Top 1%
Top 10%
Upload OA version
Are you the author? Do you have the OA version of this publication?