Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
Retinaarrow_drop_down
Retina
Article . 2000 . Peer-reviewed
Data sources: Crossref
Retina
Article . 2000 . Peer-reviewed
Data sources: Crossref
Retina
Article . 2001
versions View all 3 versions
addClaim

This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.

You have already added 0 works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.

RESULTS OF MACULAR HOLE SURGERY IN PATIENTS OVER 80 YEARS OF AGE

Authors: Raymond N. Sjaarda; John T. Thompson;

RESULTS OF MACULAR HOLE SURGERY IN PATIENTS OVER 80 YEARS OF AGE

Abstract

To evaluate the results of macular hole surgery in patients over 80 years of age to determine if surgery is beneficial in an elderly patient population.Twenty consecutive patients over age 80 with idiopathic macular holes and 20 nonconsecutive controls younger than 80 years treated for idiopathic macular holes were compared in a retrospective, consecutive case-control series.The macular hole was closed 3 months after surgery in 19/20 eyes (95%) of patients over age 80 years and 17/20 eyes (85%) of patients under 80 years. The mean preoperative visual acuity was 20/160 in patients over 80 years and 20/160-1 in patients under 80 years. The mean visual acuity at 3 months was 20/63 in eyes of patients over 80 years and 20/80 in eyes of patients under 80 years (P = 0.3). The mean visual acuity was 20/50-2 in eyes of patients over 80 years and 20/63-2 in eyes of patients under 80 years at the final examination (P = 0.403).Macular hole surgery is beneficial in patients over 80 years of age, with very similar results to those of patients younger than 80 years of age. Age should not be the primary criterion for recommending macular hole surgery.

Keywords

Aged, 80 and over, Male, Fluorocarbons, Visual Acuity, Middle Aged, Retinal Perforations, Postoperative Complications, Treatment Outcome, Vitrectomy, Prone Position, Humans, Female, Aged, Retrospective Studies

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    citations
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    12
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Top 10%
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
citations
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
12
Average
Top 10%
Average
Related to Research communities
Upload OA version
Are you the author? Do you have the OA version of this publication?