
<script type="text/javascript">
<!--
document.write('<div id="oa_widget"></div>');
document.write('<script type="text/javascript" src="https://www.openaire.eu/index.php?option=com_openaire&view=widget&format=raw&projectId=undefined&type=result"></script>');
-->
</script>To evaluate the results of macular hole surgery in patients over 80 years of age to determine if surgery is beneficial in an elderly patient population.Twenty consecutive patients over age 80 with idiopathic macular holes and 20 nonconsecutive controls younger than 80 years treated for idiopathic macular holes were compared in a retrospective, consecutive case-control series.The macular hole was closed 3 months after surgery in 19/20 eyes (95%) of patients over age 80 years and 17/20 eyes (85%) of patients under 80 years. The mean preoperative visual acuity was 20/160 in patients over 80 years and 20/160-1 in patients under 80 years. The mean visual acuity at 3 months was 20/63 in eyes of patients over 80 years and 20/80 in eyes of patients under 80 years (P = 0.3). The mean visual acuity was 20/50-2 in eyes of patients over 80 years and 20/63-2 in eyes of patients under 80 years at the final examination (P = 0.403).Macular hole surgery is beneficial in patients over 80 years of age, with very similar results to those of patients younger than 80 years of age. Age should not be the primary criterion for recommending macular hole surgery.
Aged, 80 and over, Male, Fluorocarbons, Visual Acuity, Middle Aged, Retinal Perforations, Postoperative Complications, Treatment Outcome, Vitrectomy, Prone Position, Humans, Female, Aged, Retrospective Studies
Aged, 80 and over, Male, Fluorocarbons, Visual Acuity, Middle Aged, Retinal Perforations, Postoperative Complications, Treatment Outcome, Vitrectomy, Prone Position, Humans, Female, Aged, Retrospective Studies
| citations This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 12 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 10% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
