<script type="text/javascript">
<!--
document.write('<div id="oa_widget"></div>');
document.write('<script type="text/javascript" src="https://www.openaire.eu/index.php?option=com_openaire&view=widget&format=raw&projectId=undefined&type=result"></script>');
-->
</script>
To describe the safety and efficacy of open laparoscopy as a method of access to the abdominal cavity for laparoscopic surgery.We reviewed retrospectively all cases of open laparoscopy we did between August 1970 and June 1999.Twenty-seven (0.5%) of 5284 patients who had open laparoscopies during the study years developed complications related to primary access. Twenty-one had minor wound infections, four had minor hematomas, one developed an umbilical hernia that required reoperation, and one had an inadvertent injury to the small bowel that was repaired intraoperatively without adverse outcome. Access to the abdominal cavity was generally secured in 3-10 minutes.Open laparoscopy was associated with no method failure or life-threatening complications. Minor and medium risk complications occurred at a rate of 0.5%. Open laparoscopy is a safe, effective method of accessing the abdominal cavity.
Adult, Aged, 80 and over, Male, Adolescent, Middle Aged, Medical Records, Gynecologic Surgical Procedures, Postoperative Complications, Risk Factors, Abdomen, Humans, Female, Laparoscopy, Illinois, Child, Aged, Retrospective Studies
Adult, Aged, 80 and over, Male, Adolescent, Middle Aged, Medical Records, Gynecologic Surgical Procedures, Postoperative Complications, Risk Factors, Abdomen, Humans, Female, Laparoscopy, Illinois, Child, Aged, Retrospective Studies
citations This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 123 | |
popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% | |
influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 1% | |
impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% |