Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
addClaim

This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.

You have already added 0 works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.

Open Laparoscopy: 29-Year Experience

29-Year Experience
Authors: Nasir Rana; Nakka Aruna Aruna Kumari; Carlos Rotman; Harrith M. Hasson;

Open Laparoscopy: 29-Year Experience

Abstract

To describe the safety and efficacy of open laparoscopy as a method of access to the abdominal cavity for laparoscopic surgery.We reviewed retrospectively all cases of open laparoscopy we did between August 1970 and June 1999.Twenty-seven (0.5%) of 5284 patients who had open laparoscopies during the study years developed complications related to primary access. Twenty-one had minor wound infections, four had minor hematomas, one developed an umbilical hernia that required reoperation, and one had an inadvertent injury to the small bowel that was repaired intraoperatively without adverse outcome. Access to the abdominal cavity was generally secured in 3-10 minutes.Open laparoscopy was associated with no method failure or life-threatening complications. Minor and medium risk complications occurred at a rate of 0.5%. Open laparoscopy is a safe, effective method of accessing the abdominal cavity.

Related Organizations
Keywords

Adult, Aged, 80 and over, Male, Adolescent, Middle Aged, Medical Records, Gynecologic Surgical Procedures, Postoperative Complications, Risk Factors, Abdomen, Humans, Female, Laparoscopy, Illinois, Child, Aged, Retrospective Studies

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    citations
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    123
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Top 10%
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Top 1%
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Top 10%
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
citations
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
123
Top 10%
Top 1%
Top 10%
Upload OA version
Are you the author? Do you have the OA version of this publication?