
<script type="text/javascript">
<!--
document.write('<div id="oa_widget"></div>');
document.write('<script type="text/javascript" src="https://www.openaire.eu/index.php?option=com_openaire&view=widget&format=raw&projectId=undefined&type=result"></script>');
-->
</script>Between 1973 and 1975, 16 patients evaluated for infertility at Duke University Medical Center were diagnosed as having luteal phase deficiency. A majority had had prior infertility surveys, and the average duration of their infertility exceeded 2 years. The diagnosis was suspected after study of basal body temperature charts and menstrual patterns in more than 80% of the patients. This diagnosis was established by timed endometrial biopsy. The primary method of therapy was supplementation of the luteal phase with progesterone vaginal suppositories. The pregnancy rate after therapy was 50% and pregnancy occurred after a mean of five treatment cycles. The minimal follow-up of patients who failed to conceive was 8 months. To date, the majority of these pregnancies have been completed without complication and the remainder are progressing satisfactorily. Two additional patients developed luteal phase deficiency while taking clomiphene citrate and became pregnant with progesterone supplementation.
Male, Luteal Phase, Chorionic Gonadotropin, Body Temperature, Clomiphene, Menstruation, Corpus Luteum, Pregnancy, Humans, Female, Infertility, Female, Infertility, Male, Progesterone
Male, Luteal Phase, Chorionic Gonadotropin, Body Temperature, Clomiphene, Menstruation, Corpus Luteum, Pregnancy, Humans, Female, Infertility, Female, Infertility, Male, Progesterone
| citations This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 94 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 1% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% |
