Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
Nursing Researcharrow_drop_down
Nursing Research
Article . 1962 . Peer-reviewed
Data sources: Crossref
PEDIATRICS
Article . 1962 . Peer-reviewed
Data sources: Crossref
versions View all 2 versions
addClaim

This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.

You have already added 0 works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.

Streptococcal infection in families

Authors: Robert J. Haggerty; Roger J. Meyer;

Streptococcal infection in families

Abstract

Sixteen lower-middle-class families, comprising 100 persons, were intensively studied for one year, with systematic throat cultures for beta-hemolytic streptococci, periodic measurements of antistreptolysin O titer, and clinical evaluation of all illnesses; the results of those observations were compared to certain dependent variables of host, agent, and environment. The factors that seemed to play an important part in determining whether a given person acquired a streptococcus, became ill with this acquisition, or developed a subsequent increase in antistreptolysin O were age, season, closeness of contact with an infected person as measured by sleeping arrangements, acute or chronic family stress, and penicillin treatment. No relationship was found between streptococcal episodes and the number or type of streptococci present, sex of the patient, the presence or absence of tonsils, an allergic history, changes in weather, type of housing, or family size. Further evidence for the multiple causation of beta-hemolytic streptococcal disease has been obtained, although the mechanisms through which these factors exert their influence are not clear.

Related Organizations
  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    citations
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    220
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Top 10%
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Top 1%
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
citations
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
220
Top 10%
Top 1%
Average
Related to Research communities
Upload OA version
Are you the author? Do you have the OA version of this publication?