Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
addClaim

This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.

You have already added 0 works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.

Open Fractures of the Patella

Authors: Michael E. Torchia; David G. Lewallen;

Open Fractures of the Patella

Abstract

We retrospectively reviewed 57 open patella fractures treated at our institution between 1976 and 1989. Forty-four patients with 47 fractures (cases) were available for follow-up a mean of 9.4 years after injury (range 2.2-15.7). High-energy vehicular trauma was the cause of injury in > 90% of cases. Treatment included osteosynthesis in 50% of cases and patellectomy (partial or total) in the remainder. At follow-up evaluation, results were excellent in 17% of cases, good in 60%, fair in 17%, and poor in 6%. Nonunion occurred in two cases in which nonrigid internal fixation was used. The incidence of deep infection was 10.7%, and the infection rate correlated with the magnitude of soft-tissue injury. Two of the seven fractures (29%) treated with cerclage wiring became infected. None of the open type I and II fractures treated with immediate internal fixation or primary wound closure (or both) became infected. Therefore, we recommend immediate rigid internal fixation (other than cerclage wiring) of types I and II open patella fractures. Partial patellectomy of highly comminuted fractures provided results similar to those of internal fixation of less comminuted fractures. Thus, when comminution precludes fixation, partial patellectomy can be performed without hesitation. The timing of wound closure should be individualized.

Related Organizations
Keywords

Adult, Aged, 80 and over, Fracture Healing, Male, Adolescent, Patella, Middle Aged, Fracture Fixation, Internal, Fractures, Open, Postoperative Complications, Osteogenesis, Child, Preschool, Fractures, Ununited, Humans, Surgical Wound Infection, Female, Child, Aged, Follow-Up Studies, Retrospective Studies

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    citations
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    97
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Top 10%
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Top 10%
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
citations
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
97
Top 10%
Top 10%
Average
Upload OA version
Are you the author of this publication? Upload your Open Access version to Zenodo!
It’s fast and easy, just two clicks!