<script type="text/javascript">
<!--
document.write('<div id="oa_widget"></div>');
document.write('<script type="text/javascript" src="https://www.openaire.eu/index.php?option=com_openaire&view=widget&format=raw&projectId=undefined&type=result"></script>');
-->
</script>
pmid: 7964672
Using the Waldrop scale, minor physical anomalies were studied in 82 Caucasian subjects, including 41 schizophrenic and 8 bipolar adults, as well as 14 normal and 19 mentally retarded adults. An increased incidence of minor physical anomalies was found in the mentally retarded adults relative to the other groups. Consistent with previous studies, there was a trend for the total mean Waldrop score of the schizophrenic group to be higher than the mean score of the normal group. Minor physical anomalies (assessed by the Waldrop scale), however, appear to be of questionable utility in identifying "congenital" schizophrenia, at least as this putative subgroup of schizophrenia is currently conceptualized.
Adult, Male, Bipolar Disorder, Adolescent, Foot Deformities, Congenital, Comorbidity, Middle Aged, Congenital Abnormalities, Diagnosis, Differential, Intellectual Disability, Schizophrenia, Humans, Female, Eye Abnormalities, Age of Onset, Ear, External, Mouth Abnormalities, Hand Deformities, Congenital, Head, Aged
Adult, Male, Bipolar Disorder, Adolescent, Foot Deformities, Congenital, Comorbidity, Middle Aged, Congenital Abnormalities, Diagnosis, Differential, Intellectual Disability, Schizophrenia, Humans, Female, Eye Abnormalities, Age of Onset, Ear, External, Mouth Abnormalities, Hand Deformities, Congenital, Head, Aged
citations This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 50 | |
popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% | |
influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 10% | |
impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% |