Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
addClaim

This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.

You have already added 0 works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.

How High Can the Standardized Uptake Value Be?

Authors: Hongming Zhuang; Abass Alavi; Marc Hickeson; Thomas K. Chacko;

How High Can the Standardized Uptake Value Be?

Abstract

Positron emission tomography using the glucose analog fluorine-18 fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG PET) provides a unique means for the in vivo noninvasive assessment of metabolism in tumors and other disorders. A high degree of increased metabolism in a lesion is often suggestive of malignancy in the appropriate clinical setting, whereas low levels of FDG uptake are associated with benign disorders. The standardized uptake value (SUV) is a semiquantitative means for determining the relative degree of metabolism in a lesion. An SUV greater than 2.5 is highly suggestive of a malignant lesion, whereas lesions with an SUV less than 2.5 are frequently benign. However, it is unclear how high the SUV of a malignant lesion can reach. Here the authors describe a patient with anaplastic thyroid cancer. The primary lesion in the neck had a maximal SUV of 125.1 and an average SUV of 66.2. Based on current knowledge, this is the highest SUV level ever reported for a malignant lesion.

Keywords

Lung Neoplasms, Carcinoma, Middle Aged, Reference Standards, Urinary Bladder Neoplasms, Fluorodeoxyglucose F18, Humans, Tissue Distribution, Thyroid Neoplasms, Radiopharmaceuticals, Radionuclide Imaging, Neoplasm Staging

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    citations
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    3
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
citations
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
3
Average
Average
Average
Related to Research communities
Cancer Research
Upload OA version
Are you the author? Do you have the OA version of this publication?