Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
addClaim

This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.

You have already added 0 works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.

Value of Single Photon Absorptiometry in Osteoporosis Screening

Authors: Gordon L. Bilbrey; Jeff Weix; Gordon D. Kaplan;

Value of Single Photon Absorptiometry in Osteoporosis Screening

Abstract

Radial bone mineral content and bone mineral density were measured in 1515 women referred for osteoporosis screening. A detailed questionnaire allowed the selection of 1069 normal white women for further analysis who had no historical evidence of bone disease or predisposing factors for bone disease. The nondominant radius was measured at two locations: the midradial bone density (MRBD) composed of predominantly cortical bone and the distal radial bone density at the 5 mm site (DRBD) composed of a mixture of cortical and trabecular bone. Women considered at risk were defined as those whose bone density values fell below fracture risk levels (0.550 g/cm2 for the MRBD and 0.325 g/cm2 for the DRBD). Between the ages of 20 and 70 years, the DRBD showed significantly greater sensitivity in defining subjects at risk (N = 223) than than MRBD (N = 80); P less than 0.001. Analysis of all ages showed that 684 women were above the fracture risk value (FRV) at both sites (64.0%), 260 were below the FRV at the DRBD 5 mm site (24.3%), 14 were below the FRV at the MRBD site (1.3%), and 111 were below the FRV at both sites (10.4%). Postmenopausal women age 50 to 70 years receiving estrogen replacement therapy (N = 221) had significantly higher values at both sites (P less than 0.001) than age-matched postmenopausal women not receiving replacement therapy (N = 239). Hereditary factors significantly correlated with both sites but neither site showed that calcium intake, activity level, or cigarette smoking were significant variables.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Keywords

Reference Values, Humans, Mass Screening, Osteoporosis, Female, Radionuclide Imaging, Bone and Bones, Densitometry

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    citations
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    9
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Top 10%
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
citations
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
9
Average
Top 10%
Average
Upload OA version
Are you the author of this publication? Upload your Open Access version to Zenodo!
It’s fast and easy, just two clicks!