Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
addClaim

This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.

You have already added 0 works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.

Importance of nausea

Authors: Karen Jenns;

Importance of nausea

Abstract

Oncology nurses and patients identify nausea and vomiting as the two most distressing side effects of chemotherapy. The onset and duration of nausea and vomiting in patients receiving chemotherapy may vary. Inadequate control of emesis in the first 24 h following chemotherapy can lead to anticipatory nausea and vomiting and poor control in subsequent cycles of treatment. It may also result in delays or refusal by the patient to have further treatment. In addition, excessive nausea, as well as vomiting, can lead to a multitude of physical, psychologic, and social problems. It is therefore important that nausea is controlled equally as well as vomiting. Recent clinical research into new antiemetic therapy has highlighted the need for standard criteria for the assessment of nausea and vomiting. Assessment should include nausea as a separate phenomenon that may occur in the absence of vomiting and can be equally, if not more, distressing. Objective measures are suitable for the assessment of vomiting, but are not available for assessment of nausea because it is a subjective phenomenon. The purpose of this article is to present evidence supporting the idea that patient reporting using a four-point scale may be a reliable indicator of the degree of nausea and antiemetic efficacy.

Related Organizations
Keywords

Treatment Refusal, Vomiting, Neoplasms, Oncology Nursing, Antiemetics, Humans, Antineoplastic Agents, Nausea, Nursing Assessment

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    citations
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    41
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Top 10%
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Top 10%
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
citations
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
41
Average
Top 10%
Top 10%
Upload OA version
Are you the author? Do you have the OA version of this publication?