<script type="text/javascript">
<!--
document.write('<div id="oa_widget"></div>');
document.write('<script type="text/javascript" src="https://www.openaire.eu/index.php?option=com_openaire&view=widget&format=raw&projectId=undefined&type=result"></script>');
-->
</script>
An in vitro wound model was created to determine the mechanism by which bacteria cause skin graft failure. A wound surface was simulated by a human fibrin clot. Staphylococcus aureus or group A streptococcus was incubated over the clot. Either saline, human plasminogen, aprotinin, or epsilon-aminocaproic acid (EACA), or a combination of these, was added to the tubes. After 30 hours, the tubes were examined for the presence of the clot. The supernatant was then examined for the presence of fibrin degradation products (FDP). S. aureus was incapable of destroying the fibrin clot without the presence of plasminogen in the culture media. Group A streptococcus was capable of some clot degradation, but this was markedly improved in the presence of plasminogen. High FDP levels correlated with the destruction of the clot. Both aprotinin and EACA were capable of preserving the fibrin clots. In this study we carefully controlled the chemical and bacterial milieu on a simulated wound.
Fibrin Fibrinogen Degradation Products, Staphylococcus aureus, Streptococcus pyogenes, Graft Survival, Humans, Plasminogen, Skin Transplantation, Models, Biological, Antifibrinolytic Agents, Skin
Fibrin Fibrinogen Degradation Products, Staphylococcus aureus, Streptococcus pyogenes, Graft Survival, Humans, Plasminogen, Skin Transplantation, Models, Biological, Antifibrinolytic Agents, Skin
citations This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 23 | |
popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 10% | |
impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |