
This study determined the anesthetic efficacy of midazolam (MID) in terms of its ability to reduce enflurane MAC (EMAC). Control EMAC was determined by the tail-clamp method in 15 mongrel dogs. Each animal then received at least three incremental infusion rates of MID from among the following: 0.48, 2.4, 9.6, 19.2, 28.8, 48, or 151.2 micrograms.kg-1.min-1. MAC was determined during each infusion rate following a 1-h observation period, during which time MID concentration in plasma [( MID]) stabilized. [MID] was measured every 15 min beginning 45 min from the start of each new infusion rate. There was a linear relationship between MID infusion rates and the resulting [MID] (r = 0.995). In the range of [MID] from 14 to 14,118 ng/ml, there was a linear relationship between the log [MID] and the percent EMAC reduction. The slope of the line was very shallow, and the [MID] required to reduce EMAC by more than 50% exceeded the [MID] likely to be employed clinically in humans (750 ng/ml). Also, the 73 +/- 4% (mean +/- SEM) EMAC reduction produced by [MID] = 9,763 +/- 1213 ng/ml was not significantly greater than the 60 +/- 3% EMAC reduction achieved by [MID] = 1,464 +/- 293 ng/ml, a finding which suggests a ceiling effect to the anesthetic efficacy of midazolam. The authors conclude that, within the dose range of MID likely to be employed in humans, MID produced a concentration-dependent reduction of enflurane MAC in the dog. In doses above those likely to be employed clinically, a ceiling effect to the anesthetic efficacy of MID may become evident.
Enflurane, Male, Dogs, Midazolam, Animals, Maximum Allowable Concentration, Anesthesia, Inhalation, Infusions, Intravenous, Adjuvants, Anesthesia
Enflurane, Male, Dogs, Midazolam, Animals, Maximum Allowable Concentration, Anesthesia, Inhalation, Infusions, Intravenous, Adjuvants, Anesthesia
| citations This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 59 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 10% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% |
