Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
addClaim

This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.

You have already added 0 works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.

On the Safety of Radial Artery Cannulation

Authors: Carolee Arlund; Arthur S. Keats; Stephen Slogoff;

On the Safety of Radial Artery Cannulation

Abstract

The frequency of complications following radial artery cannulation for monitoring purposes was determined in 1,699 cardiovascular surgical patients and in 83 patients in whom cannulation was performed in another artery after failure at the radial site. Patients were examined and radial artery flow determined by a Doppler technique 1 day and 7 days after decannulation. Although partial or complete radial artery occlusion after decannulation occurred in more than 25% of the patients, no ischemic damage to the hand or disability occurred in any patient. Neither duration of cannulation nor the size or material of the cannulas were determinants of abnormal flow. Abnormal flow was significantly related to female sex, the presence of hematoma, and to the use of extracorporeal circulation. The radial arteries of 16 patients whose results of Allen's test were abnormal were cannulated and no abnormal flow or ischemia followed. In 22 patients, the ulnar artery was cannulated after multiple punctures of the ipsilateral radial artery and no ischemia followed. We conclude that in the absence of peripheral vascular disease, the Allen's test is not a predictor of ischemia of the hand during or after radial artery cannulation, that when decreased or absent radial artery flow follows cannulation it is of no clinical consequence, and that radial artery cannulation is a low-risk high-benefit monitoring technique that deserves wide clinical use.

Keywords

Adult, Male, Arterial Occlusive Diseases, Thrombosis, Arteries, Hand, Catheterization, Ischemia, Regional Blood Flow, Arm, Humans, Female, Pulse

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    citations
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    380
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Top 1%
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Top 0.1%
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Top 10%
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
citations
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
380
Top 1%
Top 0.1%
Top 10%
Upload OA version
Are you the author of this publication? Upload your Open Access version to Zenodo!
It’s fast and easy, just two clicks!