
The frequency of complications following radial artery cannulation for monitoring purposes was determined in 1,699 cardiovascular surgical patients and in 83 patients in whom cannulation was performed in another artery after failure at the radial site. Patients were examined and radial artery flow determined by a Doppler technique 1 day and 7 days after decannulation. Although partial or complete radial artery occlusion after decannulation occurred in more than 25% of the patients, no ischemic damage to the hand or disability occurred in any patient. Neither duration of cannulation nor the size or material of the cannulas were determinants of abnormal flow. Abnormal flow was significantly related to female sex, the presence of hematoma, and to the use of extracorporeal circulation. The radial arteries of 16 patients whose results of Allen's test were abnormal were cannulated and no abnormal flow or ischemia followed. In 22 patients, the ulnar artery was cannulated after multiple punctures of the ipsilateral radial artery and no ischemia followed. We conclude that in the absence of peripheral vascular disease, the Allen's test is not a predictor of ischemia of the hand during or after radial artery cannulation, that when decreased or absent radial artery flow follows cannulation it is of no clinical consequence, and that radial artery cannulation is a low-risk high-benefit monitoring technique that deserves wide clinical use.
Adult, Male, Arterial Occlusive Diseases, Thrombosis, Arteries, Hand, Catheterization, Ischemia, Regional Blood Flow, Arm, Humans, Female, Pulse
Adult, Male, Arterial Occlusive Diseases, Thrombosis, Arteries, Hand, Catheterization, Ischemia, Regional Blood Flow, Arm, Humans, Female, Pulse
| citations This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 380 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 1% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 0.1% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% |
