Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/ Biology of Reproduct...arrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
Biology of Reproduction
Article . 1981 . Peer-reviewed
Data sources: Crossref
versions View all 2 versions
addClaim

Hormone-Dependent Subpopulation of Rat Testicular Luteinizing Hormone (LH) Receptors

Authors: W B, Zipf; G, Berntson;

Hormone-Dependent Subpopulation of Rat Testicular Luteinizing Hormone (LH) Receptors

Abstract

The effects of prolactin (PRL), growth hormone (GH), and luteinizing hormone (LU) treatment on testicular LI-I receptor content were studied in the hypophysectomized adult male rat. One and 2 weeks after hypophysectomy, testicular LH receptor binding capacity, as determined by 1125 1)hCG binding to whole testicular homogenates, was 14% and 16% of normal values, respectively. Seven days of s.c. LH treatment (5 pg/day), begun 1 week after hypophysectomy, caused a significant additional reduction of 1125 Il-hCG binding capacity to 10% of control values. Growth hormone administration (100 pg/day) for 7 days, begun 1 week after hypophysectomy, caused an increase in binding to 31% of control values, but simultaneous administration of LH (5 pg/day) prevented this GM-induced increase in binding capacity. Seven days of PRL treatment (100 pg/day) also caused a significant increase in [121 Il-hCG binding above the 2 week hypophysectomized control values (24%), but adding PRL to GH treatments did not result in an increase in 112511-hCG binding above that seen with GH or PRL alone. However, simultaneous administration of LH with PRL caused the induction of additional new receptors and returned total binding to 44% of normal intact control values. Combination of all three treatments (GH, PRL, and LH) showed an additive effect of the residual and PRL + LH treatment regimens and increased [12511 -hCG binding to 52% of that of normal controls. These experiments suggest 1) GM and PRL are capable of inducing new LII receptors in the regressed testis of the hypophysectomized rat, 2) PRL allows LH or LH allows PRL to induce a new LH receptor population resistant to LH down-regulation, 3) GIl causes the induction of a new population of LH receptors sensitive to LU down-regulation. These observations raise the possibility that subpopulations of Leydig cell LH receptors with different hormonal sensitivities reside within the testes.

Related Organizations
Keywords

Male, Growth Hormone, Testis, Animals, Receptors, Cell Surface, Luteinizing Hormone, Receptors, LH, Hypophysectomy, Prolactin, Rats

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    7
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
7
Average
Average
Average
bronze