Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/ The Year s Work in C...arrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
The Year s Work in Critical and Cultural Theory
Article . 2025 . Peer-reviewed
License: CC BY
Data sources: Crossref
versions View all 1 versions
addClaim

This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.

You have already added 0 works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.

Digital Humanities

Authors: Roy, D; Deshbandhu, A;

Digital Humanities

Abstract

Abstract This year’s review of digital humanities (DH) continues to position DH at the epicentre of debates around AI, while tracing how these conversations have evolved within disciplinary scholarship from 2024 and early 2025. The surveyed interventions critically examine trajectories in contemporary DH where uncritical endorsements of massive datasets and computational complexity often result in algorithmic reductionism, which can obscure and oversimplify complexities in the domain of the humanities and social sciences. Building on the authors’ emphasis on decolonial approaches in DH—scholarship that frequently develops beyond traditional Anglo-American frameworks—this survey of scholarship reveals that significant DH contributions are not necessarily dependent on vast amounts of data. Rather, meaningful work in the discipline can emerge from relatively constrained information infrastructures that leverage the strength of community connections and focus on granular and localized user experiences. The essay is organized into five key areas: small-scale databases in DH; the limitations of scale in Global South and Global Majority contexts; resistance to bias in AI, metadata, and archival practices; user relationships with archives; and the emerging role of video games as digital archives. Together, these scholarly interventions reveal how DH researchers, educators, and practitioners can and should tactically repurpose strategic digital sites, tools, and methods for nuanced approaches that prioritize humanistic enquiry over the supposed objectivity of large-scale computational paradigms.

Country
United Kingdom
Related Organizations
Keywords

301

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
0
Average
Average
Average
hybrid