
pmid: 29945220
pmc: PMC6368481
Abstract Rapidly evolving pathogens, such as viruses and bacteria, accumulate genetic change at a similar timescale over which their epidemiological processes occur, such that it is possible to make inferences about their infectious spread using phylogenetic time-trees. For this purpose it is necessary to choose a phylodynamic model. However, the resulting inferences are contingent on whether the model adequately describes key features of the data. Model adequacy methods allow formal rejection of a model if it cannot generate the main features of the data. We present TreeModelAdequacy (TMA), a package for the popular BEAST2 software, that allows assessing the adequacy of phylodynamic models. We illustrate its utility by analysing phylogenetic trees from two viral outbreaks of Ebola and H 1 N 1 influenza. The main features of the Ebola data were adequately described by the coalescent exponential-growth model, whereas the H 1 N 1 influenza data was best described by the birth-death SIR model.
570, Software for Systematics and Evolution, Bayesian phylogenetics, Genome, Viral, Hemorrhagic Fever, Ebola, phylodynamics, Ebolavirus, viral evolution, model adequacy, posterior predictive simulation, Influenza A Virus, H1N1 Subtype, Influenza, Human, Humans, Computer Simulation, BEAST2, Phylogeny, Software
570, Software for Systematics and Evolution, Bayesian phylogenetics, Genome, Viral, Hemorrhagic Fever, Ebola, phylodynamics, Ebolavirus, viral evolution, model adequacy, posterior predictive simulation, Influenza A Virus, H1N1 Subtype, Influenza, Human, Humans, Computer Simulation, BEAST2, Phylogeny, Software
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 29 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 10% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% |
