Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
downloadFull-Text
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/ KU ScholarWorksarrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
KU ScholarWorks
Article . 2010
Full-Text: http://hdl.handle.net/1808/9209
Data sources: Bielefeld Academic Search Engine (BASE)
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
Systematic Biology
Article
Data sources: UnpayWall
Systematic Biology
Article . 2010 . Peer-reviewed
Data sources: Crossref
Systematic Biology
Article . 2010
Data sources: Europe PubMed Central
https://dx.doi.org/10.1093/sys...
Article
Data sources: Microsoft Academic Graph
https://dx.doi.org/10.1093/sys...
Article
Data sources: Microsoft Academic Graph
 View all 2 versions
Claim

The Akaike Information Criterion Will Not Choose the No Common Mechanism Model

descriptionPublicationkeyboard_double_arrow_right Article 31 May 2010 United States English Publisher:Oxford University Press (OUP)Journal:Systematic Biology, volume 59, pages 477-485 (issn: 1063-5157, eissn: 1076-836X, Copyright policy )
Authors: Holder, Mark T.; Lewis, Paul O.; Swofford, David L.;

doi: 10.1093/sysbio/syq028

pmid: 20547783

handle: 1808/9209

The Akaike Information Criterion Will Not Choose the No Common Mechanism Model

Abstract

This is an electronic version of an article published in Systematic Biology [Holder, Mark T., Paul O. Lewis, and David L. Swofford. The Akaike information criterion will not choose the no common mechanism model. Systematic Biology, 59(4):477{485, 2010. ] Systematic Biology is available online at informaworld http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/sysbio/syq028.

Country
United States
Related Organizations
Keywords

020, Models, Statistical, Models, Genetic, Biological Evolution

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    		 21
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    		 Top 10%
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    		 Top 10%
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    		 Top 10%
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
21
Top 10%
Top 10%
Top 10%
Green
bronze