Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
addClaim

The Relationships of Rana Sylvatica and the Monophyly of the Rana Boylii Group

Authors: Thomas J. Post; Thomas Uzzell;

The Relationships of Rana Sylvatica and the Monophyly of the Rana Boylii Group

Abstract

Post, T. J. and T. Uzzell (Department of Vertebrate Biology, Academy of Natural Sciences, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19103) 1980. The Relationships of Rana sylvatica and the Monophyly of the Rana boylii Group. Syst. Zool., 30:170-180.-Reciprocal immunological distances were measured using antisera to the serum albumins of Rana sylvatica and representatives of five groups of Holarctic Rana (R. pipiens, R. catesbeiana, R. temporaria, R. lessonae, and R. muscosa or R. aurora or both). Scaled reciprocal values for three data sets (with R. muscosa, with R. aurora, or with both) were used to generate three sets of Fitch and Margoliash phenograms. The nine lowest percent standard deviations ranged from 6.18 to 8.44, 5.20 to 6.95, and 7.51 to 9.12, respectively. The interspecific distances in both the input and network matrices suggest that R. sylvatica is immunologically most like the eastern North American Rana. Probable cladograms place R. sylvatica either with the eastern North American Rana or in an independent lineage between the brown-frogs and the water frogs. Oneway comparisons with antigens representing 12 additional species were made using the first four antisera listed. The R. sylvatica antiserum distinguished two subgroups of eastern North American Rana while the R. temporaria antiserum did not, and the R. temporaria antiserum distinguished two subgroups of both Nearctic (Rana boylii group) and Palearctic brown frogs while the R. sylvatica antiserum did not. Our data support the monophyly of the Rana boylii group, the affinity of the Palearctic brown frogs to the R. boylii group, and a distant association between R. sylvatica and the eastern North American Rana. [Microcomplement fixation; Holarctic Rana; paraphyly.]

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    20
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Top 10%
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
20
Average
Top 10%
Average
Upload OA version
Are you the author of this publication? Upload your Open Access version to Zenodo!
It’s fast and easy, just two clicks!