
doi: 10.1093/rpd/ncs298
pmid: 23169815
The use of dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) units primarily for the assessment of fracture risk and in the diagnosis of osteoporosis is ubiquitous in Europe and ever-expanding in its implementation worldwide. DXA is known for its reported low radiation dose and precision in the determination of bone mineral density. However, the use of simple suspension criteria, as proposed in the new EC report RP-162, will identify units that are unfit for useful and safe diagnosis. Such suspension levels, however, are not a substitute for regular maintenance, quality control testing and optimisation of clinical outcomes.
Quality Control, Risk, Phantoms, Imaging, Europe, Fractures, Bone, Absorptiometry, Photon, Radiation Protection, Treatment Outcome, Bone Density, Calibration, Humans, Osteoporosis, Radiometry
Quality Control, Risk, Phantoms, Imaging, Europe, Fractures, Bone, Absorptiometry, Photon, Radiation Protection, Treatment Outcome, Bone Density, Calibration, Humans, Osteoporosis, Radiometry
| citations This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
