
doi: 10.1093/rpd/nch349
pmid: 15353693
The Institute of Radiation Protection and Nuclear Safety (IRSN) organized a biological dosimetry international intercomparison with the purpose of comparing (i) dicentrics yield produced in human lymphocytes; (ii) the gamma and neutron dose estimate according to the corresponding laboratory calibration curve. The experimental reactor SILENE was used with different configurations: bare source 4 Gy, lead shield 1 and 2 Gy and a 60Co source 2 Gy. An increasing variation of dicentric yield per cell was observed between participants when there were more damages in the samples. Doses were derived from the observed dicentric rates according to the dose-effect relationship provided by each laboratory. Differences in dicentric rate values are more important than those in the corresponding dose values. The doses obtained by the participants were found to be in agreement with the given physical dose within 20%. The evaluation of the respective gamma and neutron dose was achieved only by four laboratories, with some small variations among them.
Chromosome Aberrations, Neutrons, Observer Variation, Internationality, Quality Assurance, Health Care, Reproducibility of Results, Dose-Response Relationship, Radiation, Reference Standards, Radiation Dosage, Risk Assessment, Chromosomes, Radiation Protection, Gamma Rays, Nuclear Reactors, Leukocytes, Mononuclear, Humans, France, Radioactive Hazard Release, Radiometry, Relative Biological Effectiveness
Chromosome Aberrations, Neutrons, Observer Variation, Internationality, Quality Assurance, Health Care, Reproducibility of Results, Dose-Response Relationship, Radiation, Reference Standards, Radiation Dosage, Risk Assessment, Chromosomes, Radiation Protection, Gamma Rays, Nuclear Reactors, Leukocytes, Mononuclear, Humans, France, Radioactive Hazard Release, Radiometry, Relative Biological Effectiveness
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 34 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 10% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% |
