COMPARISON OF THE PERFORMANCE OF TWO OSL READERS FOR THE PERSONAL DOSE EQUIVALENT HP(10) MEASUREMENT
Copyright policy )COMPARISON OF THE PERFORMANCE OF TWO OSL READERS FOR THE PERSONAL DOSE EQUIVALENT HP(10) MEASUREMENT
Abstract Technical performances of two optically stimulated luminescence readers including, a microStar reader and an Auto 200 reader both manufactured by Landauer, Inc. were studied by the National Radiation Protection Agency Dosimetry Laboratory using manufacturer and International Electrotechnical Commission requirements. The two reader tools demonstrated satisfactory results as they met all the requirements. The two readers showed similar performance for the overall uncertainty and the Coefficient of Variation tests. The microStar reader showed better performances for the linearity and quality control tests, whereas the Auto 200 reader has a lower limit of detection. Moreover, an average shift of 0.08 mSv exists when measuring the doses with the two readers.
- National Radiation Protection Agency of Cameroon Cameroon
- Université de Yaoundé I Cameroon
Luminescence, Uncertainty, Radiation Dosage, Radiometry
Luminescence, Uncertainty, Radiation Dosage, Radiometry
selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources.This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).5 popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.Top 10% influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).Top 10% impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.Top 10%
Citations provided by BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!