
doi: 10.1093/ptj/78.3.321
To the Editor: We read with great interest the article on the effectiveness of hamstring muscle stretching (October 1997) by Bandy et al. Stretching is often prescribed in treatment regimens for physical ailments; however, the exact duration and timing of therapy remain highly controversial. We applaud this latest effort to resolve this debate. Unfortunately, several factors severely limit this study's applicability to the “real world” of clinical medicine. In the conclusion, the authors state that “there was no difference between stretching one or three times per day using either a 30- or 60-second duration of stretching.” This statement may mislead any therapist who reads only the abstract or the conclusion. The statement “three times per day” is usually interpreted as an even spacing of treatment over the course of a day.… [ ARTICLE][1] [1]: /lookup/volpage/77/1090?iss=10
| citations This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 3 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
