
doi: 10.1093/ptj/70.6.398
pmid: 2345784
To the Editor: Lein et al, responding to Cameron's concern that they had not controlled for placebo effect, seem to miss the point ( Physical Therapy , December 1989, Letters to the Editor, pages 1118–1120). Lein et al say they “designed [their] study1 to advance another step,” based on “accepting the findings” of two studies2,3 in which, by their account, “the placebo… was not applied with strong suggestion.” Yet they cite these studies as proof that “placebo [does] not increase experimental pain threshold.” Of course, it is the stronger suggestion (and subject expectation) accompanying treatment that must be eliminated in order to distinguish between placebo and other physiological responses. According to Melzack and Wall,4 only a double-blind study is a valid test of the strength of placebo response.… [ ARTICLE][1] [1]: /lookup/volpage/69/1118?iss=12
Research Design, Humans, Placebo Effect
Research Design, Humans, Placebo Effect
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
