Consensual discrimination

descriptionPublicationkeyboard_double_arrow_right Article 24 Apr 2024 English Publisher:Oxford University Press (OUP)Journal:The Philosophical Quarterly, volume 75, pages 878-899 (issn: 0031-8094, eissn: 1467-9213,

Copyright policy )Funded by:CF | unidentified, CF | Algorithmic Decision Maki...

Authors: Andreas Bengtson; Lauritz Aastrup Munch;

doi: 10.1093/pq/pqae039

Consensual discrimination

- Summary
- Subjects
- Metrics

Abstract

Abstract What makes discrimination morally bad? In this paper, we discuss the putative badness of a case of consensual discrimination to show that prominent accounts of the badness of discrimination—appealing, inter alia, to harm, disrespect, and inequality—fail to provide a satisfactory answer to this question. In view of this, we present a more promising account.

Related Organizations

Aarhus University
Denmark

Keywords

consent, the Irrationality Account, disrespect, discrimination, harm

Impact byBIP!

	selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).	1
	popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.	Average
	influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).	Average
	impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.	Average