<script type="text/javascript">
<!--
document.write('<div id="oa_widget"></div>');
document.write('<script type="text/javascript" src="https://www.openaire.eu/index.php?option=com_openaire&view=widget&format=raw&projectId=undefined&type=result"></script>');
-->
</script>
This chapter explores the critical and theoretical reach and power of Romanticism’s poetics by examining some of the words that its practitioners deploy to describe their own work. Romanticism takes everyday, even banal words and phrases and makes them its own, inflecting and redirecting them. In so doing, Romanticism invents itself as a radically new, iconoclastic, and dissident literary movement. Paying attention to this evolving lexical cluster allows us to discern emerging patterns within and connections between ideas and practices in the major intellectual and literary developments of the late eighteenth and early nineteenth centuries. It is in the production of a newly theorized aesthetic lexicon, and in the theorizing of this lexicon, that the definition or determination of what is called ‘Romanticism’ emerges. Romantic poetics, in other words, is the Romantic lexicon.
citations This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |