
Abstract In this chapter we will, as usual, begin by discussing some physical situations that are modelled by elliptic equations, as defined in a rather unfocused way in Chapter 3. Most of the examples involve scalar second-order equations, several of which are special cases, such as steady states, of evolution models discussed in Chapters 4 and 6. The methods we will use in the subsequent analysis of these models are more ad hoc than those used on hyperbolic equations, for the simple reason that we have no general well-posedness statement analogous to that for the Cauchy problem for hyperbolic equations. Moreover, we will find that the influence of the data for elliptic problems, especially singularities in the boundary data, is much less localised and ‘coherent’ than it is for hyperbolic equations, where we recall that many kinds of singularities merely propagate along characteristics.
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
