<script type="text/javascript">
<!--
document.write('<div id="oa_widget"></div>');
document.write('<script type="text/javascript" src="https://www.openaire.eu/index.php?option=com_openaire&view=widget&format=raw&projectId=undefined&type=result"></script>');
-->
</script>
Abstract This chapter considers the “equity will not” doctrines, such as “equity will not enjoin a crime,” “equity will not protect personal rights,” “equity will not punish,” and “equity will not protect political rights.” It analyzes the formal structure of these doctrines (which is rule-exception). It also analyzes the two functions of these doctrines, namely their regulation of access to equity and their aid in preserving equity’s legitimacy. This chapter also briefly considers the “equity will not” doctrines’ current status, suggesting that most are still in use today, and concludes by arguing that they have enduring functions, even if their traditional scope may need to be adjusted.
equity, 330, rules, election law, courts, constitutional law, Law, tort, criminal law, Torts
equity, 330, rules, election law, courts, constitutional law, Law, tort, criminal law, Torts
citations This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |