<script type="text/javascript">
<!--
document.write('<div id="oa_widget"></div>');
document.write('<script type="text/javascript" src="https://www.openaire.eu/index.php?option=com_openaire&view=widget&format=raw&projectId=undefined&type=result"></script>');
-->
</script>
This chapter engages with the way in which PA liberalism deals with diversity. Stephen Macedo’s work is assumed as an illustration of this kind of theory. Here, the politicization of liberalism coexists with a commitment to the value of autonomy, although the autonomy that political liberalism refers to is a political notion. However, even in its political form, autonomy is still too controversial to be the leading value of a liberal theory. This holds especially if the centrality of autonomy does not allow a complete understanding of the transformative process of individual and group identities involved in accommodating diversity. Thus, autonomy as the main liberal value must be rejected both in its comprehensive and political form. It is the rejection of autonomy that allows us to bring to a completion the Rawlsian political turn that, in conjunction with the reliance on the value of autonomy, is unable to give diversity its due.
citations This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |