
doi: 10.1093/oep/gpv067
Consider an organization that solicits private contributions, which will partly be used to provide a public good. The organization’s goals is to maximize its profits, namely the difference between aggregate contributions and the amount it spends on providing the public good. An equilibrium exists in which many persons contribute, each contributor enjoys zero consumer surplus from contributing, and the organization takes as a profit the contributions of all but one donor. Such behavior by the organization is consistent with incomplete crowding out of governmental grants. Furthermore, when the organization is constrained to spend at least fraction of all contributions on the public good, it can have an incentive to produce inefficiently. ∗I am grateful to participants at a seminar at KU Leuven, to the hospitality of the Max Planck Institute for Tax Law and Public Finance, and particularly to Kai Konrad, for stimulating conversations.
Non-profit; Public good; Private provision; Philanthropy, jel: jel:H41, jel: jel:D64
Non-profit; Public good; Private provision; Philanthropy, jel: jel:H41, jel: jel:D64
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 5 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
