
5’ mediated cytoplasmic RNA decay is a conserved cellular process in eukaryotes. While the functions of the structured core domains in this pathway are understood, the role of abundant intrinsically disordered regions (IDRs) is lacking. Here we reconstitute the Dcp1:Dcp2 complex containing a portion of the disordered C-terminus and show its activity is autoinhibited by linear interaction motifs. Enhancers of decapping (Edc) 1 and 3 cooperate to activate decapping by different mechanisms: Edc3 alleviates auto-inhibition by binding IDRs and destabilizing an inactive form of the enzyme, whereas Edc1 stabilizes the transition state for catalysis. Both activators are required to fully stimulate an autoinhibited Dcp1:Dcp2 as Edc1 alone cannot overcome the decrease in activity attributed to the C-terminal extension. Our data provide a mechanistic framework for combinatorial control of decapping by protein cofactors, a principle that is likely conserved in multiple 5’ mRNA decay pathways.
Models, Molecular, 1.1 Normal biological development and functioning, RNA Stability, Messenger, Amino Acid Motifs, Molecular, RNA-Binding Proteins, Biological Sciences, Underpinning research, Models, Information and Computing Sciences, Catalytic Domain, Endoribonucleases, RNA and RNA-protein complexes, RNA, Generic health relevance, RNA, Messenger, Schizosaccharomyces pombe Proteins, Environmental Sciences, Developmental Biology
Models, Molecular, 1.1 Normal biological development and functioning, RNA Stability, Messenger, Amino Acid Motifs, Molecular, RNA-Binding Proteins, Biological Sciences, Underpinning research, Models, Information and Computing Sciences, Catalytic Domain, Endoribonucleases, RNA and RNA-protein complexes, RNA, Generic health relevance, RNA, Messenger, Schizosaccharomyces pombe Proteins, Environmental Sciences, Developmental Biology
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 33 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% |
